Peer Review Policy

The Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects (RJHSA) employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and significance of published research. This policy outlines the expectations for both reviewers and authors involved in the review process.

Reviewer Selection:

  • Potential reviewers are identified based on their expertise in the relevant field, as evidenced by publications, research experience, and institutional affiliation.
  • Editors strive for a diverse pool of reviewers, considering factors like geographical location and academic background.
  • Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and avoid conflicts of interest. They should disclose any potential biases or prior knowledge of the research.

Double-Blind Review Process:

  • Manuscripts are anonymized by removing author names, affiliations, and any other identifying information.
  • Each manuscript is assigned to at least two qualified reviewers.
  • Reviewers are provided with a review form that outlines specific criteria for evaluation, including:
    • Originality and significance of the research question.
    • Soundness of research methodology and data analysis.
    • Clarity and coherence of writing and argumentation.
    • Adherence to ethical research principles.
    • Contribution to the existing body of knowledge in the field.
  • Reviewers submit written reports with detailed feedback and recommendations for the authors.
  • Editors consider the reviewers' comments and make a final decision on the manuscript (accept, reject, revise and resubmit).

Communication with Authors:

  • Authors receive anonymized reviewer reports along with the editorial decision.
  • In the case of a revise and resubmit decision, authors have the opportunity to address the reviewers' concerns and improve their manuscript.
  • Editors may facilitate communication between reviewers and authors if necessary to clarify specific points.

Confidentiality:

  • The identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process.
  • Reviewers are expected to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript content.
  • Authors are prohibited from contacting reviewers directly.

Commitment to Quality:

  • RJHSA is committed to upholding the highest standards of scholarly integrity.
  • The peer review process is designed to ensure that published research is rigorous, methodologically sound, and makes a valuable contribution to the field.
  • This policy is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect best practices in academic publishing.

Additional Considerations:

  • The journal may employ a single-blind review process for certain manuscript types, such as review articles.
  • Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the journal's Aims and Scope before submitting their manuscript.
  • RJHSA reserves the right to withdraw an offer of publication if ethical concerns arise or if the authors fail to address reviewer feedback adequately.