Leadership in hierarchy: The role of head teachers in shaping organizational power distance

Authors

  • Muhammad Amanullah PhD Research Scholar, Department of Educational Research and Assessment, University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Hafiz Muhammad Arshad Associate Professor, Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Khalid Saleem Associate Professor, Department of Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, University of Okara, Punjab, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.03.88

Keywords:

Instructional Leadership, Power Distance, Secondary Schools, Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract

 The present study aimed at examining the effect of head teachers' leadership practices on the power distance in the organization of public secondary schools of Punjab, Pakistan. The high power distance and downward communication in public schools reflect a centralized bureaucratic structure. A multistage stratified random sampling technique was used to collect data with 1214 respondents (309 head teachers and 905 SSTs) from three districts (Rawalpindi, Sahiwal and Bahawalpur). The instruments used for data collection were standardized instruments, namely the Instructional Leadership Questionnaire (ILQ) and the Power Distance Scale (PDS). Descriptive data, Pearson correlation, simple linear regression, independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for data analysis. Results indicated that there was a moderate, statistically significant negative relationship (r = -.48, p < .01) between instructional leadership practices and organizational power distance. Regression analysis showed that leadership practices significantly predicted and contributed to 23% of the variance in organizational power distance (R2 = .23, p < .001). The independent samples ttest revealed no significant difference in teachers' perceptions with regard to gender (t = 1.42, p = .155), while one-way ANOVA results indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in teachers' perceptions in terms of geographical districts (F = 5.14, p = .006) and professional experience brackets (F = 6.28, p = .002). The results indicate that organizational power distance is neither a fixed cultural trait, but a dynamic construct that can be actively reduced by the use of collaborative, participative and context-sensitive leadership behaviors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abid, M. N., Siming, L., Chao, H., Amin, M., & Sarwer, S. (2025). Enhancing faculty teaching performance through constructive leadership with a mediating role of job satisfaction. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 13454.

Adamovic, M. (2023). The cultural influence on employees' preferences for reward allocation rules: A two‐wave survey study in 28 countries. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(4), 889–921.

Akram, M., Kiran, S., & İlğan, A. (2017). Development and validation of instructional leadership questionnaire. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6, 73–88.

Arif, R. Jamil, M. & Naseer, B. (2023). Challenges of instructional supervision faced by primary school heads. Pakistan Journal of Law, Analysis and Wisdom, 2(3), 189-196.

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Karaferye, F., & Walker, A. (2025). How cultural context shapes school leadership and its effectiveness: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251396683

Jamil, M., Sewani, R., & Muhammad, N. (2024). Leadership practices of head teachers in public schools of Punjab. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(1), 83–92.

Karnia, R. (2024). Importance of reliability and validity in research. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), 137–141.

Kavgacı, H., Savaş, G., Özdemir, N., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2026). Cultivating collective teacher innovativeness in high power distance settings: The role of empowering leadership and collective teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 176, Article 10554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105541

Khalil, A. (2021). Transformational leadership of head teachers and academic optimism: Perspectives of teachers in secondary schools. Bulletin of Education and Research, 43(2), 61–74.

Mincu, M. E., & D’Addio, A. (2026). How school leaders decide when school autonomy is low: Interactive leadership to navigate system governance. School Leadership & Management, 46(3), 300–321.

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of SpiruHaret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82.

Ombao, E. J. M., & De Jesus, L. F. (2025). Towards success: The impact of school head leadership style on school performance—A systematic review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 3(1), 173–186.

Özkul, R. (2026). Context-based leadership and organizational culture in schools: The mediating roles of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. BMC Psychology, 14(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04163-8

Plaku, A. K., & Leka, K. (2025, March). The role of leaders in shaping school culture. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, Article 1541525). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541525

Tozlu, D., & Hoşgörür, T. (2024). Leadership styles and teachers’ power distance perceptions. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 11(2), 49–69.

Urooj, T., Kamran, F., Ain, Q., & Jamil, M. (2024). Head teachers’ perspectives and implementation of green leadership in Pakistani secondary schools. Journal for Social Science Archives, 2(2), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v2i2.67

Üztemur, S., Kirişçi-Sarıkaya, A., & İlğan, A. (2026). Analysing the complex association between school principals’ hubristic leadership and teachers’ work motivation: The serial mediation of administrative communication and job stress. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1), 380. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06687-1

Vakili, M. M., & Jahangiri, N. (2018). Content validity and reliability of the measurement tools in educational, behavioral, and health sciences research. Journal of Medical Education Development, 10(28), 106–118.

Yıldız, S. (2025). The narrow corridor of heartfelt leadership: Social and emotional leadership practices in bureaucratic school cultures. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101316 Zhan, X., & Liu, X. (2026). Divergent principalteacher perceptions of how innovativeness and school challenges relate to student achievement under distributed leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 62(3), 50–78.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Amanullah, M. ., Arshad, H. ., & Saleem, K. . (2026). Leadership in hierarchy: The role of head teachers in shaping organizational power distance. Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects, 4(3), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.03.88