Generative AI and Augmented Business Analytics for Managerial Decision-Making: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis, 2019-2026

Authors

  • Dr. Khurram Shahzad Khan Assistant Professor, Department of Graduate Studies, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Maseehullah Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Mr. Sajid Yaqoob Lecturer, Department of Management Studies, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Ms. Hina Jamil Student, Department of Graduate Studies, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Generative AI, Augmented Analytics, Business Analytics, Business Intelligence, Large Language Models, Managerial Decision-making, Bibliometric Analysis, Scopus

Abstract

The business landscape is changing with the introduction of generative AI and augmented analytics, which transform business intelligence from descriptive reporting to a more conversational experience, from automatic insight generation to the ability to explain decisions or use AI to guide managerial judgment. In this study, fragmentation is tackled by conducting a bibliometric and thematic analysis of 92 documents retrieved between 2019 and 2026 from the Scopus database. The analysis includes performance analysis, citation analysis, country and source mapping, keyword co-occurrence, bibliographic coupling and thematic mapping using Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny, and Excel. The results indicate a young field that is growing quickly with 77.2% of documents published in 2025-2026, and an annual growth rate of 63.32%. The corpus is dominated by conference papers, which reflects the early dissemination of knowledge, and the core conceptual vocabulary includes business intelligence, large language models, artificial intelligence, generative AI, natural language processing and augmented analytics. The thematic structure indicates that the field is characterized by a focus on decision making, language models and business intelligence, and the need for trust, explainability, effectiveness of validation, data governance and human-AI collaboration is not fully integrated. The study makes a significant contribution by shifting the focus from GenAI as a mere technical extension of BI to a new decision-intelligence capability. It also proposes a conceptual framework linking generative AI, augmented analytics, business analytics capability, managerial decision quality, governance mechanisms and business performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alghamdi, N. A., & Al-Baity, H. H. (2022). Augmented analytics driven by AI: A digital transformation beyond business intelligence. Sensors, 22(20), 8071.

https://doi.org/10.3390/s22208071

Alhur, M., & Alsaudi, O. (2025). Mapping emerging trends in augmented analytics and generative AI for business intelligence: A bibliometric analysis (2019-2025). Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15849/zjjb.v1i01.30

Alparslan, A. (2025). The role of accuracy and validation effectiveness in conversational business analytics. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3540975

Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016). How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 113-131.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Arslan, M., & Cruz, C. (2024). Business-RAG: Information extraction for business insights. Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Business Technologies.

https://doi.org/10.5220/0012812800003764

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Benbya, H., Davenport, T. H., & Pachidi, S. (2020). Special issue editorial: Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(4), ix-xxi.

Cao, G., Duan, Y., & Li, G. (2015). Linking business analytics to decision making effectiveness: A path model analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(3), 384-395.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2441875

Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.

https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503

Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Harvard Business School Press.

Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108-116.

Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K. C., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2026). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.21838

Desai, D., & Desai, A. (2025). Integrating generative AI in business intelligence: A practical framework for enhancing augmented analytics. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 10(3).

https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2025.10.3.036

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines? Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A., & Davern, M. J. (2008). Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.03.001

Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.

https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057

Gupta, M., & George, J. F. (2016). Toward the development of a big data analytics capability. Information & Management, 53(8), 1049-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004

Handler, A., Larsen, K. R., & Hackathorn, R. (2024). Large language models present new questions for decision support. International Journal of Information Management, 79, 102811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102811

Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577-586.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007

Mekimah, S., Nabi, H., & Selmane, N. (2024). Business intelligence in organizational decision-making: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and gaps (2014-2024). Discover Sustainability, 5, Article 692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00692-7

Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics and firm performance: Findings from a mixed-method approach. Journal of Business Research, 98, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.044

Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434

Nhan, V. K., & Thu, T. T. (2026). Mapping the landscape of algorithmic management in gig economy: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 6, 100402.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2026.100402

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Praveen, S. V., Gajjar, P., Ray, R. K., & Dutt, A. (2024). Crafting clarity: Leveraging large language models to decode consumer reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103975

Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66-83.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257

Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.

Sivarajah, U., Kamal, M. M., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Critical analysis of big data challenges and analytical methods. Journal of Business Research, 70, 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J. F., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009

Weng, L., Tang, Y., Feng, Y., Chang, Z., Chen, R., Feng, H., Hou, C., Huang, D., Li, Y., Rao, H., Wang, H., Wei, C., Yang, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Huai, J., & Chen, T. (2025). DataLab: A unified platform for LLM-powered business intelligence. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE65448.2025.00326

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khan, D. K. S. ., Dr. Maseehullah, Yaqoob, M. S. ., & Jamil, M. H. . (2026). Generative AI and Augmented Business Analytics for Managerial Decision-Making: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis, 2019-2026. Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects, 4(2), 219-242. https://rjhsa.com/index.php/rjhsa/article/view/86