The Great Decoupling: A Case Study of US Foreign Policy Toward China and the Paradox of Strategic Realignment (2020–2025)
Keywords:
U.S.-China Relation, The Great Decoupling, Strategic Realignment, Multilateral Diplomacy, Geopolitical Shift, Trade War, U.S. Foreign Policy, China RiseAbstract
This research studies the strategic realignment in the U.S. and China from 2020 to 2025, pointing on the contradiction of the Great Decoupling between two of the most powerful states in the world. Through worldwide trade links, source chains, and assets runs, the United States and China remain to be intensely linked despite their progressively acute monetary decoupling, technical competition, and armed hostility. Both states and the greater worldwide power system expect severe problems as a consequence of this paradox, which syndicates geopolitical competition with monetary interdependence. The research employs a qualitative case study methodology, applying primary and secondary sources to assess how both powers' policies and strategies have altered in response to struggles in them. Significant suppositions demonstrate that the trade clash in the United States and China, technological disengagement in fields like 5G and artificial intelligence (AI), and the growing armed rivalry of the Indo-Pacific region have backed to the growing strains. There are still diplomatic ways advancing predominantly in fields like climate variation and worldwide health. The research discovers the tactical inconsistency where the two states, as they are rival in their domains which are significant to their world power, must cooperate in subjects of mutual interest. The outcomes designate that the worldwide monetary is still improbable to become fully decoupled because of the interconnection in the two monitories, but the existing tactical competition in the U.S. and China is redefining the upcoming of global power, as well as the method of global trade.
Downloads
References
Blinken, A. J. (2026). The Administration's Approach to the People's Republic of China. Washington, DC: George Washington University, U.S. Department of State.
Cheng, L. (2021). iden’s China strategy: Coalition-driven competition or Cold War-style confrontation? NW, Washington: Brookings Institution.
Chivvis, C. S. (2026). Implementing the Biden administration’s China strategy. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Collier, D. (1993). The comparative method. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.
Commerce, U. D. (2022). Commerce implements new export controls on advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing items to the People's Republic of China (PRC). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Industry and Security.
David, J. E. (2023). Biden official dismisses idea of US-China "divorce". Arlington, Vinginia: Axios.
Defense, U. D. (2023). 2023 report on military and security developments involving the People's Republic of China. Arlington, Virginia: U.S. Department of Defense.
Fajgelbaum, K. A. (2021). The economic impacts of the US-China trade war. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hass, R. (2025). How will the Biden administration’s China policy be remembered? NW, Washington: Brookings Institution.
Hollweck, T. (2014). Review of Case study research design and methods (5th ed.) by R. K. Yin. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 1-5.
Johnston, A. I. (2013). How new and assertive is China’s new assertiveness? International Security, 37(4), 7-48.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Can China rise peacefully? Chicago, United State: The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
Pompeo, M. R. (2020). Communist China and the Free World's Future. Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, Yorba Linda, CA.: U.S. Department of State.
Relations., C. o. (2026). U.S.-China Relations: 1949–2026. New York: Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Representative, U. T. (2024). USTR announces final modifications to Section 301 tariff actions on China: Protecting American workers and businesses from unfair trade practices. St. NW, Washington, D.C.: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
Reuters. (2019). Taiwan at the heart of U.S.-China tensions: Trump, Xi's meeting and the future of Taiwan's sovereignty. London, United Kingdom: Reuters.
Zhang, J. &. (2021). Containment and hedging: The U.S. strategic perspective on China’s Polar Silk Road Initiative. Marine Development, 2(31).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khizra Naeem, Tallat Yasmin, Shehar Bano (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



