Sovereign Territorialities and Environmental Challenges: Regional Environmental Complexes, Polycentric Regimes, and Climate Governance in South Asia
Keywords:
South Asia, Climate Change, Sovereignty, Tragedy of the Commons, International Regimes, Polycentric Governance, Regional Environmental Complex, Climate Regime Complex, Transboundary Rivers, Environmental SecurityAbstract
South Asia is among the most climate vulnerable regions in the world, but its environmental governance is stuck in a state-driven political framework. This paper looks at the conflict of sovereignty and trans-boundary ecological systems in South Asia. It presents suggestions that the challenge of climate change in the region is not only a ‘technical' one of adaptation, but also a ‘diplomatic' one of weak cooperation. It is a structural governance issue that emerges when two logics clash: the tragedy of the commons (where shared ecological systems are "taken for granted" by actors acting at their own level of authority) and the sovereignty dilemma (that states do not wish to be bound by regional institutions due to the fact that territorial sovereignty is the dominant norm for regional politics). The paper builds on the notion that “Regional Environmental Complex” is a term for ecological systems that extend beyond state boundaries and need to be governed beyond the limitations of national planning. These complexes comprise the Himalayan cryosphere, the Indus-Ganga-Brahmaputra river systems, the Indo-Gangetic airshed and the larger delta zone of the Bay of Bengal. The paper links this concept with regime theory and polycentric governance in international policy development, and posits the concept of Regional Environmental Complexes as sub-regional ecological regime complexes within a wider climate regime complex.
Downloads
References
Asian Development Bank. (2014). Assessing the costs of climate change and adaptation in South Asia. Asian Development Bank.
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science, 326(5956), 123–125.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2026). Indus Waters Treaty: History, summary, disputes, court of arbitration, neutral expert, & facts. https://www.britannica.com/event/Indus-Waters-Treaty
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (1995). Local commons and global interdependence: Heterogeneity and cooperation in two domains. Sage.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.
Krasner, S. D. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 1–21). Cornell University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Cornell University Press.
Majaw, B. (2012). Climate change and South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. Journal of Indian Research, 1(3), 23–32.
Mishra, V., Bhatia, U., & Tiwari, A. D. (2020). Bias-corrected climate projections for South Asia from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-6. Scientific Data, 7, Article 338.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
Phanbuh, J. I. A. (2025, June 18). Suspending the Indus Waters Treaty: What it means and why it matters. New Security Beat, Wilson Center. https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2025/06/suspending-the-indus-waters-treaty-what-it-means-and-why-it-matters/
SAARC. (2010). Thimphu Statement on Climate Change: Towards a green and happy South Asia. Sixteenth SAARC Summit, Thimphu, Bhutan.
South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. (2010). Thimphu statement on climate change. SAARC Secretariat.
Thapa, B. (2013). Thimphu statement on climate change (Policy Brief No. 28). South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment (SAWTEE).
United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Adaptation gap report 2024: Come hell and high water. UNEP.
Vaidya, R. A. (2014). Climate risks in the SAARC region: Ways to address the social, economic and environmental challenges. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI).
Wester, P., Chaudhary, S., Chettri, N., Jackson, M., Maharjan, A., Nepal, S., & Steiner, J. F. (Eds.). (2023). Water, ice, society, and ecosystems in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: An outlook. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). https://doi.org/10.53055/ICIMOD.1028
Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A., & Shrestha, A. B. (Eds.). (2023). Water, ice, society, and ecosystems in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: An outlook. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.
World Bank. (2021). Glaciers of the Himalayas: Climate change, black carbon, and regional resilience. World Bank.
World Bank. (2021). Glaciers of the Himalayas: Climate change, black carbon, and regional resilience. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/06/01/to-slow-himalayan-glacier-melt-curbing-air-pollution-is-key
World Bank. (2023). Striving for clean air: Air pollution and public health in South Asia. World Bank.
Young, O. R. (1989). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Cornell University Press.
Toor, M. J., Shabbir, S., Rauf, A., Nisar, A., Safdar, S., & Zaib-Un-Nisa. (n.d.). The role of structured-communication-technique in developing pragmatic language capability among ASD-children. https://doi.org/10.63878/cjssr.v3i2.785
Toor, M. J., Mehmood, H., Yasmeen, A., Honey, Q., Waseem, M., & Wasif, M. (n.d.). Exploring the effect of verbal encouraging phrases (VEP) on Chinese language learners’ academic achievement at university level.
Toor, M. J., Arafat, M., Ayoub, M., Ali, M., & Alessi Longa, F. E. (n.d.). From coherent self to fragmented persona: Digital identity fragmentation and academic self-concept among Generation Z, with comparative insights from Generation Alpha. https://doi.org/10.63878/cjssr.v4i2.2318
Katsitadze, N., Kharadze, N., & Pirtskhalaishvili, D. (2025). The impact of social media on students’ effective time management. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-200-210
Toor, M. J., Zafar, S., Omer, F., Sarwar, M., & Hussain, A. K. (n.d.). Teachers’ perspectives on effectiveness of translanguaging in enhancing English language learning at secondary school level.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Sehar Sabir, Dr. Shah Rukh Hashmi , Sumayya Bibi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
