Integrating ecological, systems, person-in-environment, and strengths perspectives in school social work: The IES-PESB framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.03.114Keywords:
Ecological, System, Person in Environment, Strength, Perspective, Framework, School Social WorkAbstract
Students’ experiences of emotional and social problems in school are influenced not only by individual traits but also by relationships, institutions, communities, and macrosocial conditions. As such, school social work practice requires a unified conceptualisation of professional reasoning that links children lived experiences to the multiple contexts and systems that shape them. Though ecological, systems, Person-in-Environment (PIE), and strengths-based frameworks each inform school social work, their relative roles are seldom clearly specified within a singular formulation-to-action process. The present conceptual paper outlines the Integrated Ecological–Systems–Person- in-Environment–Strengths-Based (IES-PESB) Framework, an integrative architecture for professional reasoning designed to guide school social work practice. Locating ecological contexts, tracing systems, assessing person–environment transactions and student agency, and mobilising strengths are identified as discrete but related functions of ecological, systems, PIE, and strengths-based perspectives, respectively. These functions are operationalised through six iterative steps: Locate, Trace, Assess, Mobilise, Intervene, and Reassess. Existing practice approaches such as consultation, case management, family involvement, advocacy, solution-focused practice, and Multi- Tiered Systems of Support are conceptualised as intervention techniques that may be employed consistent with formulation. The paper generates theoretical propositions for future testing and posits that the primary contribution of the IES-PESB framework is its explicit linkage of ecological, systems, transactional, and strengths-based reasoning to intervention matching and iterative feedback. This framework may provide a helpful conceptual underpinning to organised school social work practice, especially within under-resourced schools.
Downloads
References
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International encyclopaedia of education, 3(2), 37-43.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bio ecological model of human development. Handbook of child psychology, 1.
Frey, A. J., Alvarez, M. E., Sabatino, C. A., Lindsey, B. C., Dupper, D. R., Raines, J. C., ... & Norris, M. P. (2012). The development of a national school social work practice model. Children & Schools, 34(3), 131-134. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cds025
Frey, A. J., Alvarez, M. E., Sabatino, C. A., Lindsey, B. C., Dupper, D. R., Raines, J. C., ... & Norris, M. P. (2012). The development of a national school social work practice model. Children & Schools, 34(3), 131-134.
Hamdani, S. U., Huma, Z. E., Malik, A., Tamizuddin-Nizami, A., Javed, H., Minhas, F. A., ... & Wang, D. (2024). Effectiveness of a group psychological intervention to reduce psychosocial distress in adolescents in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 8(8), 559-570.
Hamdani, S. U., Huma, Z. E., Malik, A., Tamizuddin-Nizami, A., Javed, H., Minhas, F. A., ... & Wang, D. (2024). Effectiveness of a group psychological intervention to reduce psychosocial distress in adolescents in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 8(8), 559-570.
Hamdani, S. U., Huma, Z. E., Suleman, N., Warraitch, A., Muzzafar, N., Farzeen, M., ... & Wissow, L. S. (2021). Scaling‐up school mental health services in low resource public schools of rural Pakistan: The Theory of Change (ToC) approach. International journal of mental health systems, 15(1), 8.
Hamdani, S. U., Huma, Z. E., Tamizuddin-Nizami, A., Baneen, U. U., Suleman, N., Javed, H., ... & Rahman, A. (2022). Feasibility and acceptability of a multicomponent, group psychological intervention for adolescents with psychosocial distress in public schools of Pakistan: a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT). Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 16(1), 47.
Kelly, M. S., Frey, A., Thompson, A., Klemp, H., Alvarez, M., & Berzin, S. C. (2015). Assessing the national school social work practice model: Findings from the second national school social work survey. Social Work, 61(1), 17-28.
Kondrat, M. E. (2002). Actor-centered social work: Re-visioning “person-in-environment” through a critical theory lens. Social Work, 47(4), 435-448.
Kondrat, M. E. (2015). Person-in-environment. In Oxford bibliographies in social work. Oxford University Press.
Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social work, 41(3), 296-305.
Saleebey, D. (2008). The strengths perspective: Putting possibility and hope to work in our practice. In B. W. White, K. M. Sowers, & C. N. Dulmus (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare Vol. 1. The profession of social work (pp. 123–142). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470373705.chsw001011
Siporin, M. (1980). Ecological systems theory in social work. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 7, 507.
Tan, K., White, J., Hillen, M., & Alvarez, M. (2020). Addressing student social and emotional needs: An ecological systems framework to advocate for school social work services. School Social Work Journal, 45(1), 16-39.
Thompson, A. M., & PIESTER, J. (2016). Multi-tiered systems of support. School social work: National perspectives on practice in schools, 149.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abid Hussain, Farhat Ullah, Humera Manzoor (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



