English as a medium of instruction in the age of AI: Challenges, opportunities, and linguistic implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.03.112Keywords:
English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI), Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Classroom Discourse, Language Learning, Academic Integrity, Linguistic ImplicationsAbstract
This study aims to explore the role of AI in transforming EMI teaching and learning, the opportunities and challenges this brings, and the linguistic implications. The study has qualitative characteristics (thematic analysis) and uses secondary and documentary data, including peer-reviewed EMI and AI-in-education literature and sources, institutional literature and publications, policy guidance, and literature from discussions of higher-education practice. Sources have been coded iteratively and synthesised into nine analytical domains. AI provides access to vocabulary, grammar, translation, pronunciation practice, and immediate feedback, enables differentiated instruction, and frees up teachers' time to focus on instructional design and/or critical mediation. But benefits depend on pedagogical purpose. Without careful use, it can facilitate dependency and reduced interaction, lower verification, undermine assessment, and worsen the digital divide for students. Practices, expectations, and teacher readiness; student AI proficiency; ethical guidelines; digital access; and the commitment to maintaining the integrity of human interaction are all essential to linguistic outcomes. The article proposes a 5-dimensional framework for the responsible use of AI in EMI. It suggests that AI is not meant to replace the linguistic, pedagogical, and intellectual involvement of the human factor during the mediation action.
Downloads
References
Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: The gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77(6), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0323-5
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., de Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2020). ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23463-8
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction A growing global phenomenon. British Council.
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1
Galloway, N., Kriukow, J., & Numajiri, T. (2017). Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction movement in China and Japan. British Council.
Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2015). Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.09.001
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Content and language in policy and practice. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E. (2020). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0261444817000350
McCrocklin, S. M. (2016). Pronunciation learner autonomy: The potential of automatic speech recognition. System, 57, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.013
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). OECD digital education outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1787/062a7394-en
O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497–515.
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the postpandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Pun, J., & Macaro, E. (2019). The effect of first and second language use on question types in English medium instruction science classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2020). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149–2161.https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019. 1590690
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity.
UNESCO. (2023a). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
UNESCO. (2023b). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bushra Shaukat, Majid Khan, Dr. Mehwish Habib, Younas Khan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
